by John Coulthard on May 17, 2012
Microsoft is introducing Carbon trading. From 1 July we will be charged, along with all of our offices and data centres a fee for every ton of carbon we produce. The revenue collected will be used to purchase Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and carbon offsets, allowing Microsoft to declare itself carbon neutral.
by John Coulthard on May 11, 2012
by John Coulthard on May 10, 2012
Many of us will have seen Live on Mars TV Series, the outlandish tale of a policeman finding himself thrust back into the past to deal with the problems of the future. While it is clearly fiction it may be nearer the truth than you might think. The NHS have flipped the story by using the technology of the past to deliver change today. And sadly that is not a good thing.
NHS Direct’s aim was to encourage people to go online and self care rather than calling 999 or turning up at their GP surgery or A&E. You can measures it success by analysing the fall in such attendances. It also provides a channel for people who think they may have one or other of the more contagious flus we have all but forgotten about.
So it is some interest that I see the NHS abandoning NHS Direct and moving to NHS 111, a call centre solution… Yes, that’s right moving people from online to the phones…. So what is that about?
Perhaps the data suggests that people calling 111 are encouraged to self care, perhaps fewer attend GPs or A&E… Well the data, and the trials are not complete yet, seems to show that many more people attend their GPs and A&E after calling 111 than would have been the case if NHS Direct had been used.
So why is the NHS making the change. I think there are 3 reasons
- The failure of the Information Strategy … The latest attempt has been pulped… So that is two epic fails in a row.
- The cost of 111 is less than NHS Direct … The NHS struggles to understand the demand side cost of what it does… So while 111 may cost less; the effect of the strategy is to probably increase the costs of the NHS as a whole.
- The ICT function and strategy of the NHS still lacks sufficient, capable and motivated leaders… Who is actually in charge… Where is the kind of leadership that has made Kaiser Permanente ICT such a success.
So what is it that we should do:
- Publish the NHS information strategy in its current form
- Create a community of people who can debate and crowd source an improved strategy
- Develop in the minds of NHS Senior and political leaders an understanding of what an effective ICT strategy would look like and the advantages it would deliver.
In the next episode ….
by John Coulthard on November 22, 2011
Was I the last to know that most of the big charities make more money by “trading” than they do from donations. So if I look at a few :
- Leonard Cheshire - 92% of income from Charitable Activities 7.5% from donations
- Action for Children – 90.8% of income from Charitable Activities 7.7% from donations
- BARNARDO’S -64 % of income from Charitable Activities 17.8% from donations
Many do rely on donations:
- Help for Heroes – 14% from Charitable Activities and 79.7% from donations
- NSPCC – 15% of income from Charitable Activities 76% from donations
- ALZHEIMER’S SOCIETY – 34.9% of income from Charitable Activities 54.2% from donations
You can find all of this information from the Charity Commission web site.
Should the corporate response be the same for those both groups? Perhaps businesses should provide more support to those that rely on donations.